The Effects of Lickling on Submissive and Switch Subjects: An Analysis of Archived Footage from Fettish Labs' Initial Experiments

Abstract

This study examines archived footage from Fettish Labs' early explorations into "Lickling," a hybrid sensory technique combining oral worship — specifically l*cking, nibbling, and biting — with tickle activation on the soles of the feet. Four female volunteers — Alicia Justine, Kylie Moone, Nayru, Fae Donata, and Ally Lust — were subjected to controlled Lickling sessions within B*SM b*ndage setups. Responses varied significantly, ranging from initial resistance and disgust to uncontrollable laughter, heightened arousal, and even orgasmic release. Contrary to expectations of uniform ticklish reactions, Lickling elicited individualized outcomes influenced by each subject's baseline personality (submissive, dominant, or switch). Notably, due to a personal conversion, the lab director ceased direct participation in Lickling protocols; however, this does not invalidate the data from prior experiments. Findings suggest Lickling amplifies sensitivity, blending p*in, pleasure, and hysteria in unpredictable ways, with arousal often overriding pure tickle responses post-stimulation.

Introduction

Fettish Labs pioneered tickle-based B*SM research in the early 2010s, focusing on foot-centric tickle punishment as a gateway to psychological and physiological submission. "Lickling" emerged as an innovative method: the deliberate application of a dominant's tongue, teeth, and lips to a bound subject's soles, escalating from worshipful l*cks to aggressive nibbles and bites, often culminating in feather-light or tool-assisted tickling. This technique tests the boundaries between revulsion, laughter-induced hysteria, and erotic overload.

Prior tickle testing seldom times yielded low reactivity in subjects, but Lickling's wet, invasive intimacy appeared to rewire responses, flooding neural pathways with mixed signals of vulnerability and desire. This paper analyzes footage from five key sessions involving four volunteers, plus one experimenter - subject dynamic. Hypotheses: (1) Lickling does not produce standardized reactions but varies by temperament; (2) Oral elements heighten arousal, potentially leading to climax even in low-reactivity subjects; (3) Post-Lickling tickling intensifies hysteria due to elevated sole sensitivity.

Ethical note: All participants consented under lab protocols. The director's withdrawal from Lickling does not affect data integrity.

Methods

Volunteers were selected for diversity in B*SM roles: pure submissives, sadistic dommes, and switches. Sessions occurred in a controlled studio environment with high - definition archival footage. B*ndage emphasized hogties, mummification, and restraint tables to immobilize feet, ensuring soles were fully exposed and vulnerable. Gags (tape, b*ll, or wrap) silenced protests, heightening helplessness.

Lickling Protocol: Initiated with slow, teasing l*cks along arches and toes, progressing to nibbling heels and bites on b*lls of feet. Tickle escalation in the following tests applies fingers and mouth/tongue. Measurement: Responses assessed via audible cues (giggles, laughter, moans), visible signs (squirming, flushing, lubrication), and post-session interviews (where available). No quantitative metrics (e.g., heart rate) were recorded; analysis relies on qualitative footage review. Subjects: Alicia Justine (submissive). Kylie Moone (sadistic domme), with Ayla Jae as experimenter. Nayru (switch, submissive-leaning). Fae Donata (switch, submissive-leaning). Ally Lust (prior volunteer, unspecified lean).

Sessions were non-participatory for the director post-conversion.

Results

Subject 1: Alicia Justine

Alicia, a naturally submissive 28-year-old with pale, size-7 soles, entered with a history of low tickle reactivity — prior tests elicited mere smiles, no hysteria. Bound in a classic hogtie with coarse ropes cinching her wrists to ankles, her mouth sealed by layers of duct tape, Alicia's feet were arched upward like offerings. The Lickling began innocently: a warm tongue tracing her high arches, lapping at the soft skin with deliberate slowness, savoring the faint salty tang of her unwashed soles.

Initial response: Mild twitching, muffled hums through the gag. But as the tongue delved between toes—sucking each one like a throbbing c*ck, swirling around the sensitive pads—Alicia's body betrayed her. Nibbles followed, teeth grazing the b*lls of her feet, then a sharp bite that drew a gasp. Post-Lickling, fingers danced across her now-slick soles, and the transformation was stark: peals of laughter erupted, her hogtied form bucking wildly as tickles h*t hypersensitive nerves. Arousal surged — moaning, mingling with hysterical cackles. Hypothesis: The oral invasion primed erogenous zones, converting dormant ticklishness into a feedback loop of p*in-pleasure, causing unexpected laughter-arousal synergy.

Subject 2: Kylie Moone

Kylie, a 32-year-old sadistic domme known for inflicting t*rment, was an intriguing reversal. Strapped in supple leather restraints forming a hogtie, her b*ll gag drooling as her perfectly pedicured size-7 soles thrust skyward, Kylie exuded defiance. Her friend Ayla Jae, a playful dominant, took charge, ignoring Kylie's dominant persona.

Lickling commenced with Ayla's tongue flicking Kylie's heels, lapping upward in broad, sloppy strokes that coated her soles in saliva. Kylie grunted disgust through the gag while her eyes flashed dominance. But persistence paid off: as Ayla nibbled the tender undersides of her toes, biting just hard enough to sting, Kylie's facade cr*cked. Giggles bubbled up, escalating to full-throated laughter as the tongue burrowed between her wiggling digits. Ayla escalated with tickles, fingers skittering over the drenched feet, sending Kylie into convulsive fits — her dominant ego shattered by involuntary hysteria.

Analysis: Kylie's dual reactions (disgust to giggles) stem not just from her s*dism but the betrayal of control; the wet, submissive act of being orally serviced on her "power tools" (feet) triggered a masochistic overload, far beyond standard tickling.

Subject 3: Nayru

Nayru, a 22 - year-old switch with submissive leanings, was mummified neck-to-ankles in glossy bl*ck tape, her mouth a wrapped gag, hair yanked back and leashed to her own big toes for excruciating arching. Her size-6 soles, smooth and olive-toned, quivered in anticipation.

Lickling opened with giggles — light, breathy — as the tongue worshipped her bound feet, l*cking the exposed undersides with fervent laps that made the tape glisten. Laughter built as nibbles targeted her arches, teeth scraping like a predator's tease. But midway, arousal dominated: moans replaced chuckles, her mummified hips grinding futilely as the tongue probed her most ticklish spots, slicking them for deeper penetration. Tickles post-Lickling barely elicited laughs; instead, Nayru panted in frustrated ecstasy, her release denied.

Variance: Nayru's switch nature allowed quick pivot from laughter to lust, suggesting Lickling's erotic humidity dissolves submissive barriers faster in balanced personalities.

Subject 4: Fae Donata

Fae, 29, a submissive-leaning switch, was sheathed in leather on the Tickle Table—arms and legs splayed, feet locked in stocks with toes splayed wide. Her size-7.5 soles, pale and wrinkled from tension, begged for mercy.

The Devils Fork—a vibrating dual-prong tool—joined the Lickling, b*zzing between her toes while a tongue slurped her heels. Laughter poured out nonstop, a hysterical torrent as the vibrations hummed against saliva-slick skin, her body convulsing in the restraints. Arousal peaked rapidly. Climax h*t like a storm—Fae screaming with laughter, soles spasming. Post-release, a stiff brush scrubbed her ultra-sensitive feet, unleashing pure hysteria: wild, tear-streaked laughter as every nerve fired in overdrive.

Key insight: *rgasm via Lickling elevated sole sensitivity exponentially, turning post-climax tickling into unbearable agony-ecstasy.

Subject 5: Ally Lust

Ally, a 30-year-old repeat volunteer with unknown orgasmic potential, was bound in the leather body sheath on the table, toes tied, feet oiled and exposed. Prior sessions showed tickle tolerance without climax.

Lickling unlocked her: a probing tongue devouring her arches, nibbling toes until they curled in futile escape. Laughter started soft but built, her mood shifting from playful resistance to desperation, as bites marked her soles red. The addition of mouth contact alone flipped her script: arousal laced every giggle, culminating in a shuddering quake that left her in a state of exhaustion and laughing in aftershocks.

Commonality: Ally's response mirrors others, indicating oral elements universally spike erotic responses in tickle scenarios.

Discussion

Lickling defies standardization; while all subjects laughed, arousal varied by temperament—submissives like Alicia integrated it seamlessly, dommes like Kylie resisted then shattered, and switches like Nayru and Fae balanced both intensely. The oral factor (wetness, intimacy) likely activates sole erogenous zones, explaining post-Lickling hypersensitivity and mood shifts toward climax. Biting/nibbling adds a dominance layer, amplifying submission. Limitations: Subjective footage analysis; no controls without Lickling. Future research could quantify via biometrics.

Conclusion

Lickling transforms tickle play into a potent B*SM tool, eliciting bespoke reactions that blend hysteria with potential arousal. These archived sessions highlight b*ndage's role in vulnerability, with foot worship as the ultimate dominator. Who knew a tongue could rewrite a sub's screams?

Laughing Lickling Foot Fetish Lickling Compilation with C4s.com