Field Observation Report: Hogtickling Scenario – Subject Ty, Natasha
Date: [INSERT DATE] | Lead Researcher: [INSERT NAME]

Subject Overview

Name: Natasha Ty Designation: ASN-742 Prior Sensitivities: Inner thighs (Grade 3 reactivity), soles (Grade 4 reactivity, tool-dependent) Restraint History: Responsive to box tie + vertical frogtie combinations (see Experiment 12-B).

Apparatus & Positioning

Upper Body Restraint: Classic box tie configuration (paracord, 8mm). Arms secured horizontally behind the lower back, limiting scapular movement. Shoulders hyperextended to amplify thoracic rigidity. Purpose: Eliminate upper-body evasion tactics observed in prior trials. Lower Body Restraint: Modified frogtie variant (ankles tethered to upper thighs via leather straps). Angle: 145-degree hip flexion, knees splayed at 45 degrees. Outcome: Full exposure of inner thighs, perineum, and soles. Facial Monitoring: Objective: Capture microexpressions (e.g., lip tremors, knitted brow, open mouth anticipation, wide eyes) during stimulus application.

Stimulus Protocol
Phase 1: Bare-Handed Tactile Methods (Inner Thighs)

Technique: Oscillating pressure between fingertips and nails (gloves removed). Pattern: Spiral trajectories from proximal adductors to inguinal crease. Hypothesis: Discomfort from restraint will amplify laughter-to-struggle movement ratio by 22% (see Ty’s 2023 meta-analysis).

Phase 2: Tool-Based Soles application

Tools Deployed: The Shocker v1 and v2

Phase 3: Discomfort Synergy Analysis

Metric: Time-to-breakpoint comparisons between Hogtickling (current) vs. Supine Spread Eagle (Experiment 9-D). Prediction: Restraint-induced lumbar strain will reduce p*in tolerance by 18 seconds ( ± 3.2).

Conclusion
Hogtickling configuration successfully merges ergonomic discomfort with sensory overload. Recommend escalating inner thigh focus in future trials, as Subject Ty’s reactivity suggests untapped nerve clusters.

Tickling Armpits Classic Tickling Foot Fetish Hogtickled - Natasha Ty with C4s.com