Subjects:

Nikki Sabel

Rayne Storm

Treatment:

The Tickle Table

Duration:

Twenty six minutes and fifty five seconds

Method:

Specimen Nikki Sabel (henceforth NS) is to be secured upon the tickle table, whereby she is wrapped in a leather sheath with it strapped shut, then layered with eight wide straps. Escape will be rendered impossible.

All of her toes will then be laced back and held in place for the duration of the experiment.

Specimen Rayne Storm (henceforth RS) will similarly be placed upon a separate tickle table, then into a leather sheath, but due to strap shortages in the testing area, she will have been zipped up tightly from ankles to neck. A total of four straps placed in the primary spots whereby test subjects resist the most: knees, ankles, chest, shoulder area.

RS will then have her toes bound back with lace for the next phase.

RS will first have her soles covered in h*ney, to speed the heating process. NS will then have her soles coated in h*ney.

Subject RS will then signal when she is unable to take any more of the heat treatment, and at that point, the source will move to subject NS.

During that time, RS will be tickled relentlessly until NS signals that she cannot handle anymore, and at that time NS will then be tickled while RS receives the heat source again. This will be repeated for three rounds to compare elevated reactions related to temperature and sensitivity.

Response:

Having worked her therapy scene just before this commenced, tester had learnt specimen RS reacted to a very heavy touch, verging into what would be considered painful to the vast majority of subjects. Combining heat and h*ney together, we were interested to see if this would generate a heightened reaction.

At three minutes and twenty eight seconds, the heat source was moved closer to RS bare soles, presenting us with feedback indicating the intensity had suddenly spiked.

At six minutes and four seconds, RS signaled she could not continue, and the heating source was placed at the foot of the table for NS to commence the roasting treatment.

The Sphere was then administered with a gargalesis method of tickling upon the plantar fascia of RS, netting extremely positive feedback.

The Shrieker was the next tool applied without success.

Returning to the Sphere, we continued to administer treatment while remaining dispassionate although tester admitted during self evaluation that his sadistic streak had raised during the failure of the Shrieker, and the results elevated the intensity which the Sphere was administered during this second application.

With RS having her soles prepped further with both gargalesis, and heat treatment, they did become more reactive to applied knismesis via digital stimulation.

The Shocker was administered on specimen RS next, with a high degree of feedback, particularly upon the hallux distal phalanx region.

NS continued to roast for a longer period than the tester anticipated, and so precisely fifty strikes using the riding crop was administered, so that specimen RS remained tender.

The Sphere was then administered thoroughly until specimen NS signalled the need to cease her heating treatment.

The roasting method was then shifted back to subject RS while NS was given attention via knismesis and gargalesis methods.

The Sphere was again utilized, sending subject NS into intense struggling against her bonds while uncontrollably laughing.

Tester paused to tighten a single strap we became suspicious of partway though the Sphere treatment.

Returning to the testing area on specimen NS, the Sphere was utilized again.

We attempted the Shrieker and then the Shocker.

In prior tests these were successful with NS, yet during this particular test we’ve encountered an anomaly; neither provided adequate feedback.

A standard wooden ruler was provided, and administered upon the soles of subject NS to again elevate tester input.

Exactly fifty three strikes were administered before the Terrorizers were applied on the entire surface of subject NS bare soles.

This proved to be the primary reactive tool when used during this experiment on specimen NS, as hysterical laughter and futile struggling ensued.

RS then signaled her tolerance for the heat treatment had reached limit.

Replacing the heat source on NS, the Terrorizers were applied on the bare soles of RS with more success while using the gargalesis method.

Specimen NS signaled her signal to cease, and the heat source was re-applied for the final round of testing on the bare soles of RS.

Subject NS was then given the most severe tool that is very rarely applied at Fettish Labs, and can easily cross the threshold of laughter to p*in - the Wheels.

With a moderate touch between knismesis and gargalesis, subject NS reacted with a shifting mix of p*in and laughter. We were unable to find the perfect amount of pressure, though the majority of the application provided laughter.

The purpose of the experiment was heightening sensitivity and resulting laughter, so tester moved to the Sphere.

Interestingly, with the Wheels applied (causing more p*in) after the heat source, subject NS was now in an extreme mental state of sensitivity, and had then lapsed into strained, nonstop laughter.

Specimen RS had signaled during a shorter window of exposure to the heat source, and after the source was again shifted to subject NS, specimen RS received the Wheels.

At no point was a painful reaction signaled nor detected, as specimen RS laughed continually, though application of the wheels upon her plantar fascia, proximal phalanx, and metatarsal phalangeal area offered the highest positive resulted when utilized in a vertical fashion.

Subject NS then signaled her final time to cease heat exposure, and the Terrorizers were re-applied, again sending specimen into nonstop laughter - a rapid scrubbing was extremely effective.

The Tickle Tables - Nikki Sabel and Rayne Storm