Subject:

Goddess Jess

Treatment:

Hogtickled

Duration:

Twelve minutes, fifty one seconds

Method:

**Restraint will be partially displayed during the experiment**

Subject clad in bikini, will be heavily strapped with leather and secured by buckles in a hogtied position (explanation to follow).

Her ankles, wrists, knees, and elbows all connected, by tightly encircling them with leather straps and secured by buckles, while positioned on her abdomen with arms behind her.

Her legs will then be bent with her heels almost touching her buttocks, and secured in place, preventing straightening of the legs while treatment is administered. In addition, her sensitive bare soles are left upturned in the perfect position for stimulation methods.

Her upper arms will be restrained tightly via same materials to aid in the elbow b*ndage, taking strain away and ensuring safety and relative comfort. The chest strap also aides in an attachment point for the following step.

Her toes will be secured together, preventing further movement, particularly when the subjects instinctively attempt to cover one sole with the other foot while methods are employed.

Her hair will be bound up on top of her head, then attached to her ankles, holding her face in an upward position to examine facial reactions. Her mouth will be gagged with a bl*ck b*ll, secured behind her head with a leather strap, again connected by a silver buckle.

Another strap will encircle her wrists and waist, pinning her arms to her torso to reduce struggling.

Finally, a long leather strap will be connected to her ankle b*ndage then pulled up toward her aforementioned anchor strap which will have been tightened properly, in order to hold her legs in exact position, preventing movement.

The cord from her hair to toes will then be tightened downward, increasing tension on the line, cinching her head and toes in place at the same time.

Escape will be impossible.

Response:

Subject during our first testing at Fetcon 2024 in this past August had uttered during the experiment that she wants b*ndage, ‘the tighter the better’ and that she, ‘loves having her feet tickled’. In reaction to this, she was offered and eagerly volunteered for this particular method of treatment.

Her b*ndage was displayed in full view from multiple angles before beginning.

Tester will kneel at specimens knees, pinning them in place in the event she is able to attempt any lateral movement.

Digital stimulation tested initial reactions and sensitivity of the entirety of both of her bare feet, which provided positive feedback in all areas.

With specimens arms pinned in such an extreme position, tested took advantage of her lateral abdomen area, initiating an elevated response.

A spin brush brought a moderate reaction while deployed along her intermediate phalanges, and proximal phalanx area. The plantar surface was also stimulated briefly, with a similar reaction.

Data collectors take note: subject possessed the wherewithal to attempt to dislodge her ballgag partially forward in a failed dislodge maneuver. This is a failure on experimenters part, and will note future specimens will be gagged tighter, despite this failed attempt to dislodge.

The Shrieker 2.0 was then utilized in the interdigital spaces of multiple toes with great success. The distal phalanx of the hallux was particularly responsive when using the tip of the device. Subjects plantar surface was grazed lightly, before the lateral border was stimulated by the rod portion of the device.

Slow digital stimulation was applied, and subject reacted positively, and potentially toward ejaculation, after eliciting a gagged, ‘Oh yeah!’, for a moment before resuming laughter when the heavier, faster method was utilized.

The Shocker v1 was applied next upon subjects plantar surfaces, and metatarsal phalangeal area.

Returning to manual stimulation again, the sternocleidomastoid was given attention briefly, moving to the lateral femoral cutaneous nerves with great effect, before finishing at specimens metatarsal phalangeal area, and outer lateral talocrural area.

The Terrorizers 2.0 were then applied, again potentially *dging the subject toward ejaculation, given her verbal emotes - although this did not occur. This occurred when the lateral abdomen surface along with the plantar surface was contacted.

Oil was then applied with a liquid brush (restrictions within this document prevent the proper term being utilized fully, though it may be located on the Fettishtools commercial area on Etsy), then softly brushed gently upon specimens distal phalanx.

For a third time, we became curious if arousal was initiated with the verbal emotes providing feedback during this section of testing.

Potential arousal shifted when the plantar surface was stimulated in a heavier fashion, but then immediately shifted to a more intense reaction with digital methods employed again to both her plantar surface and lower quadrants of the abdomen.

Doomfeather was depoloyed with a concentration toward the interdigital spaces.

The left dorsum petis was stimulated with the device while manual stimulation was provided upon the left sole, offering an elevated reaction.

Finally, her lateral left abdomen was stimulated with Doomfeather device along with her left sternocleidomastoid area with great success.

Further testing is required to determine if specimen is capable of ejaculation during knismesis or gargalesis.

Hogtickled - Goddess Jess